netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/13] gtp: Additional feature support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171112205604.hzuttmo3pocg6bju@nataraja>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:56:04 +0900
From:   Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
To:     Tom Herbert <tom@...ntonium.net>
Cc:     "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Andreas Schultz <aschultz@...p.net>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rohit LastName <rohit@...ntonium.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 net-next 00/13] gtp: Additional feature support - Part
 I

Hi Tom,

sorry for the delayed response.  But I remain committed in pushing
the non-controversial part of your GTP patches forward.

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 06:47:59PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> Thanks.  As indicated, I'm planning some testing later this weekend on
> the non-IPv6 patches, and am happy to add my Acked-by and/or re-submit
> those to Dave after that.

After some more delays and returning from netdev 2.2, I've finally put
together a testing setup and successfully (manually) tested with the
following patches:

    01/13 vxlan: Move gro_cells_init to ndo_init
    02/13 iptunnel: Add common functions to get a tunnel route
    04/13 gtp: Call common functions to get tunnel routes and add dst_cache
    05/13 iptunnel: Generalize tunnel update pmtu
    06/13 gtp: Change to use gro_cells
    07/13 gtp: Use goto for exceptions in gtp_udp_encap_recv funcs
    08/13 gtp: udp recv clean up
    09/13 gtp: Call function to update path mtu
    10/13 gtp: Eliminate pktinfo and add port configuration

I hereby acknowledge those patches.  How should we proceed?  Should I

a) do nothing, you will add Acked-By and re-submit?

b) send an individual Acked-By in a reply to each related patch here on
   netdev and you will re-submit those patches?

c) simply create a rebased set from those patches and
   re-submit them to the list for net-next myself, with the Acked-by?

d) be preposterous and provide a gtp git tree for DaveM to pull from?

As discussed before, I will not merge/ack IPv6 will until we have an
implementation that is interoperable.  I have a TODO list of other
bugfixes and improvements for Kernel GTP, but I'm hopeful that IPv6 can
still be addressed before the end of 2017.

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)