[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1510446262.10883.54.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 16:24:22 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
"Steven J. Hill" <steven.hill@...ium.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethernet: cavium: octeon: Switch to using netdev_info().
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 14:41 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.14-rc6]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Steven-J-Hill/ethernet-cavium-octeon-Switch-to-using-netdev_info/20171024-071910
> config: mips-cavium_octeon_defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: mips64-linux-gnuabi64-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> reproduce:
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=mips
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c: In function 'octeon_mgmt_adjust_link':
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c:929:5: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else' [-Wparentheses]
>
> if (link_changed != 0)
> ^
>
> vim +/else +929 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/octeon/octeon_mgmt.c
>
> 896
> 897 static void octeon_mgmt_adjust_link(struct net_device *netdev)
> 898 {
> 899 struct octeon_mgmt *p = netdev_priv(netdev);
> 900 struct phy_device *phydev = netdev->phydev;
> 901 unsigned long flags;
> 902 int link_changed = 0;
> 903
> 904 if (!phydev)
> 905 return;
> 906
> 907 spin_lock_irqsave(&p->lock, flags);
> 908
> 909
> 910 if (!phydev->link && p->last_link)
> 911 link_changed = -1;
> 912
> 913 if (phydev->link &&
> 914 (p->last_duplex != phydev->duplex ||
> 915 p->last_link != phydev->link ||
> 916 p->last_speed != phydev->speed)) {
> 917 octeon_mgmt_disable_link(p);
> 918 link_changed = 1;
> 919 octeon_mgmt_update_link(p);
> 920 octeon_mgmt_enable_link(p);
> 921 }
> 922
> 923 p->last_link = phydev->link;
> 924 p->last_speed = phydev->speed;
> 925 p->last_duplex = phydev->duplex;
> 926
> 927 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->lock, flags);
> 928
> > 929 if (link_changed != 0)
> 930 if (link_changed > 0)
> 931 netdev_info(netdev, "Link is up - %d/%s\n",
> 932 phydev->speed, phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : "Half");
> 933 else
> 934 netdev_info(netdev, "Link is down\n");
> 935 }
> 936
I think this would be better as
if (!phydev_link) {
if (p->last_link)
link_changed = -1;
} else if (p->last_duplex != phydev->duplex ||
p->last_link != phydev->link ||
p->last_speed != phydev->speed) {
link_changed = 1;
octeon_mgnt_disable_link(p);
octeon_mgnt_update_link(p);
octeon_mgnt_enable_link(p);
}
...
if (link_changed > 0)
netdev_info(netdev, "Link is up - %d/%s\n",
phydev->speed,
phydev->duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : "Half");
else if (link_changed < 0)
netdev_info(netdev, "Link is down\n");
Powered by blists - more mailing lists