[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171113153214.33019580@elisabeth>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:32:14 +0100
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: set all.accept_dad to 0 by default
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:21:52 +0000
Erik Kline <ek@...gle.com> wrote:
> Should we consider rolling back the patch that caused this?
> "accept_dad = 1" is the proper IETF-expected default behaviour.
>
> Alternatively, if we really want to make all, default, and ifname
> useful perhaps we need to investigate a tristate option (for currently
> boolean values, at least). -1 could mean no preference, for example.
I haven't checked how ugly it would be, yet. But another way to restore
the previous behaviour, while keeping the new functionality, would be
to keep the global default as 1 and instead set the per-interface
accept_dad default value to 0. What do you think?
--
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists