netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 01/10] cls_bpf: move prog offload->netdev check into drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171113062538.GA1986@nanopsycho>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 07:25:38 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com,
        xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
        pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 01/10] cls_bpf: move prog offload->netdev
 check into drivers

Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 03:14:18AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 16:55:55 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>> 
>> In order to remove tp->q usage in cls_bpf, the offload->netdev check
>> needs to be moved to individual drivers as only they will have access
>> to appropriate struct net_device.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>
>This seems not entirely correct and it adds unnecessary code.  I think

What is not correct?


>the XDP and cls_bpf handling could be unified, making way for binding
>the same program to multiple ports of the same device.  Would you mind
>waiting a day for me to send corrections to BPF offload?

Well I'm trying to get this in before net-next closes...