netdev - Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUkMTHZA8zjky6Tmj1mdtyA0GkJXGt2QSvFd8Of63TOaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2017 09:57:36 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc:     "Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] nubus: Rename struct nubus_dev

Hi Finn,

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:12 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au> wrote:
> It is misleading to use "dev" to mean a functional resource. And
> in adopting the Linux Driver Model, struct nubus_board will embed a
> struct device. Drivers will then bind with boards, not with functional
> resources.
>
> Rename struct nubus_dev as struct nubus_functional_resource. This is
> the vendor's terminology and avoids confusion.

Isn't "struct nubus_functional_resource" a bit long?
What about "nubus_res"? "nubus_fres"?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds