[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88bbd758-4f19-381d-2479-d3e52a1259cd@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 09:03:11 -0800
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvlan: verify MTU before lowerdev xmit
On 11/14/2017 2:32 AM, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> If a macvlan device which is not in bridge mode receives a packet,
> it is sent straight to the lowerdev without checking against the
> device's MTU. This also happens for multicast traffic.
>
> Add an is_skb_forwardable() check against the lowerdev before
> sending the packet out through it. I think this is the simplest
> and best way to do it, and is consistent with the use of
> dev_forward_skb() in the bridge path.
>
> This is easy to replicate:
> - create a VM with a macvtap connection in private mode
> - set the lowerdev MTU to something low in the host (e.g. 1480)
> - do not set the MTU lower in the guest (e.g. keep at 1500)
> - netperf to a different host with the same high MTU
> - observe that currently, the driver will forward too-big packets
> - observe that with this patch the packets are dropped
>
> Cc: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
>
> ---
>
> After hearing Shannon's lightning talk on macvlan at netdev I
> figured I'd strike while the iron is hot and get this out of my
> patch queue where it has been languishing.
> ---
> drivers/net/macvlan.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> index a178c5efd33e..8adcad6798c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
> @@ -534,6 +534,10 @@ static int macvlan_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> }
>
> xmit_world:
> + /* verify MTU */
> + if (!is_skb_forwardable(vlan->lowerdev, skb))
> + return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> +
Good catch. I remember your comment on this last week, but hadn't had a
chance to look it up yet.
As for the other paths, I see that the call to dev_forward_skb() already
has this protection in it, but does the call to dev_queue_xmit_accel()
in macvlan_start_xmit() need similar protection?
sln
> skb->dev = vlan->lowerdev;
> return dev_queue_xmit(skb);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists