[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1510686467.2849.176.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:07:47 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
vyasevic@...hat.com, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
pombredanne@...b.com, vyasevich@...il.com, mark.rutland@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, adobriyan@...il.com, fw@...len.de,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
roman.kapl@...go.com, paul@...l-moore.com, dsahern@...il.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, lucien.xin@...il.com,
mschiffer@...verse-factory.net, rshearma@...cade.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, avagin@...tuozzo.com, gorcunov@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Convert net_mutex into rw_semaphore and down read
it on net->init/->exit
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 10:11 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:53:33 +0300
> Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > + * RCU-protected list, modifiable by pernet-init and -exit methods.
> > + * When net namespace is alive (net::count > 0), all the changes
> > + * are made under rw_sem held on write.
> > + */
> > + struct list_head fib_notifier_ops;
> >
>
> If you use __rcu annotation then it could be checked (and the comment is not needed).
I do not think we can use __rcu annotation yet on a struct list_head ?
(The annotation would be needed on the members)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists