[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171115054010.GS11292@secunet.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 06:40:10 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
CC: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression, 4.14] xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
xfrm_state_find breaks selinux-testsuite
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 03:46:30PM -0500, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 4.14 is failing the selinux-testsuite labeled IPSEC tests despite
> having just been fixed in commit cf37966751747727 ("xfrm: do
> unconditional template resolution before pcpu cache check"). The
> breaking commit is the very next one, commit c9f3f813d462c72d ("xfrm:
> Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in xfrm_state_find."). Unlike the earlier
> breakage, which caused use of the wrong SA, this one leads to a failure
> on connect(). Running ip xfrm monitor during one of the failing tests
> shows the following:
> acquire proto ah
> sel src 127.0.0.1/32 dst 127.0.0.1/32 proto tcp sport 0 dport 65535
> dev lo
> policy src 127.0.0.1/32 dst 127.0.0.1/32 proto tcp
> security context
> unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_inet_client_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
> dir out priority 0 ptype main
> tmpl src 0.0.0.0 dst 0.0.0.0
> proto ah reqid 0 mode transport
Yes, I see. This is because there are wildcard src and dst
addresses on the template. I'll revert this one for now.
I slowly start to think that the concept of having a socket
policy on a IPv6 socket that maps to IPv4 is fundamentally
broken. The bug I tried to fix here is not the first one
that were reported from syzkaller for this szenario and I
fear it is not the last one.
Thanks for reporting this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists