[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171116141800.GA15526@salvia>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:18:00 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the netfilter-next tree
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:46:17AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 00:40:14 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:00:52PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:02:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > > > ppc64_defconfig) produced this warning:
> > > >
> > > > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:536:15: warning: 'ctnetlink_proto_size' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > > > static size_t ctnetlink_proto_size(const struct nf_conn *ct)
> > > > ^
> > > >
> > > > Introduced by commit
> > > >
> > > > 5caaed151a68 ("netfilter: conntrack: don't cache nlattr_tuple_size result in nla_size")
> > >
> > > I assume that this warning will now be in the net-next tree ...
> >
> > It's my fault, I'll fix this in my next batch, sorry for the inconvenience.
>
> This has now made it into Linus' tree :-(
The patch is already at davem's tree. It's flying there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists