[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171116.104407.141002935068271606.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 10:44:07 +0900 (KST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: loke.chetan@...il.com
Cc: bjorn.topel@...il.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, ast@...com, brouer@...hat.com,
michael.lundkvist@...csson.com, ravineet.singh@...csson.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bjorn.topel@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anjali.singhai@...el.com, rami.rosen@...el.com,
jeffrey.b.shaw@...el.com, ferruh.yigit@...el.com,
qi.z.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] packet: introduce AF_PACKET V4 userspace API
From: chet l <loke.chetan@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 14:34:32 -0800
> I have not reviewed the entire patchset but I think if we could add a
> version_hdr and then unionize the fields, it might be easier to add
> SVM support without having to spin v5. I could be wrong though.
Please, NO VERSION FIELDS!
Design things properly from the start rather than using a crutch of
being able to "adjust things later".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists