lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171119161716.5865-1-code@rkapl.cz>
Date:   Mon, 20 Nov 2017 22:34:54 +0100
From:   Roman Kapl <code@...pl.cz>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Roman Kapl <code@...pl.cz>
Subject: [PATCH] net: sched: crash on blocks with goto chain action

tcf_block_put_ext has assumed that all filters (and thus their goto
actions) are destroyed in RCU callback and thus can not race with our
list iteration. However, that is not true during netns cleanup (see
tcf_exts_get_net comment).

Prevent the user after free by holding the current list element we are
iterating over (foreach_safe is not enough).

To reproduce, run the following in a netns and then delete the ns:
    ip link add dtest type dummy
    tc qdisc add dev dtest ingress
    tc filter add dev dtest chain 1 parent ffff: handle 1 prio 1 flower action goto chain 2

Signed-off-by: Roman Kapl <code@...pl.cz>
---
The mail was original rejected by vger, this is a re-send to netdev@...r only
(with the same message ID). Sorry for any confusion.
---
 net/sched/cls_api.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_api.c b/net/sched/cls_api.c
index 7d97f612c9b9..58fed2ea3379 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_api.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_api.c
@@ -344,16 +344,26 @@ static void tcf_block_put_final(struct work_struct *work)
 }
 
 /* XXX: Standalone actions are not allowed to jump to any chain, and bound
- * actions should be all removed after flushing. However, filters are now
- * destroyed in tc filter workqueue with RTNL lock, they can not race here.
+ * actions should be all removed after flushing.
  */
 void tcf_block_put_ext(struct tcf_block *block, struct Qdisc *q,
 		       struct tcf_block_ext_info *ei)
 {
-	struct tcf_chain *chain, *tmp;
+	struct tcf_chain *chain, *last = NULL;
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(chain, tmp, &block->chain_list, list)
+	list_for_each_entry(chain, &block->chain_list, list) {
+		if (last)
+			tcf_chain_put(last);
+		/* Flushing a chain may release any other chain in this block,
+		 * so we have to hold on to the chain across flush to known
+		 * which one comes next.
+		 */
+		tcf_chain_hold(chain);
 		tcf_chain_flush(chain);
+		last = chain;
+	}
+	if (last)
+		tcf_chain_put(last);
 
 	tcf_block_offload_unbind(block, q, ei);
 
-- 
2.15.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ