[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171121142905.GJ7918@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:29:05 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Gianluca Borello <g.borello@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Networking Development Mailing List
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: len = bpf_probe_read_str(); bpf_perf_event_output(... len) ==
FAIL
Em Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:58:24PM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> On 11/14/17 12:25 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > Yeah, I know, that's what I mentioned earlier in this thread to resolve it,
> > but do we really want to add this hack everywhere? :( Potentially any function
> > having ARG_CONST_SIZE would need to handle size 0 and bail out again in their
> > helper implementation and it ends up that progs start relying on this runtime
> > check where we won't be able to get rid of it later on anymore.
> The compiler actually does the right thing for the below code:
> int ret = bpf_probe_read_str(filename, sizeof(filename),
> filename_ptr);
> if (ret > 0)
> bpf_perf_event_output(ctx, &__bpf_stdout__,BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU,
> filename, ret & (sizeof(filename) - 1));
> Just from the above code without consulting bpf_probe_read_str internals, it
> is totally possible that ret = 128, then
> ret & (sizeof(filename) - 1) = 0.
> The issue is that the verifier did not set the "ret" initial range as (-inf,
> sizeof(filename) - 1). We could have this information associated with helper
> and feed back to verifier.
> If we have this range, later for ret & (sizeof(filename) - 1) with ret >= 1,
> the verifier should be able to conclude
> ret & (sizeof(filename) - 1) >= 1.
> To workaround the immediate problem, I tested the following hack
> with bcc and it works fine.
> BPF_PERF_OUTPUT(events);
> int trace(struct pt_regs *ctx) {
> char filename[128];
> int ret = bpf_probe_read_str(filename, sizeof(filename), 0);
> if (ret > 0) {
> if (ret == 1)
> events.perf_submit(ctx, filename, ret);
> else if (ret < 128)
> events.perf_submit(ctx, filename, ret);
> }
> return 1;
> }
> The idea is to make control flow more complex to prevent llvm
> do certain optimizations.
So, the hack makes it work for me, using clang 6.0:
set env: NR_CPUS=4
set env: LINUX_VERSION_CODE=0x40e00
set env: CLANG_EXEC=/usr/local/bin/clang
unset env: CLANG_OPTIONS
set env: KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS= -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/7/include -I/home/acme/git/linux/arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated -I/home/acme/git/linux/include -I./include -I/home/acme/git/linux/arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I/home/acme/git/linux/include/uapi -I./include/generated/uapi -include /home/acme/git/linux/include/linux/kconfig.h
set env: WORKING_DIR=/lib/modules/4.14.0+/build
set env: CLANG_SOURCE=/home/acme/bpf/open.c
llvm compiling command template: $CLANG_EXEC -D__KERNEL__ -D__NR_CPUS__=$NR_CPUS -DLINUX_VERSION_CODE=$LINUX_VERSION_CODE $CLANG_OPTIONS $KERNEL_INC_OPTIONS -Wno-unused-value -Wno-pointer-sign -working-directory $WORKING_DIR -c "$CLANG_SOURCE" -target bpf -O2 -o -
[root@...et bpf]# perf probe -V do_sys_open
Available variables at do_sys_open
@<do_sys_open+0>
char* filename
int dfd
int flags
struct open_flags op
umode_t mode
[root@...et bpf]# cat open.c
#include "bpf.h"
SEC("prog=do_sys_open filename")
int prog(void *ctx, int err, char *filename_ptr)
{
char filename[128];
int len = bpf_probe_read_str(filename, sizeof(filename), filename_ptr);
if (len > 0) {
if (len == 1)
perf_event_output(ctx, &__bpf_stdout__, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, filename, len);
else if (len < 128)
perf_event_output(ctx, &__bpf_stdout__, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU, filename, len);
}
return 1;
}
[root@...et bpf]#
[root@...et bpf]# perf trace -e *open,open.c touch /tmp/Thanks.Yonghong.Song\!
LLVM: dumping open.o
0.000 ( 0.009 ms): touch/9034 open(filename: 0x5b678e37, flags: CLOEXEC ) ...
0.009 ( ): __bpf_stdout__:/etc/ld.so.cache....)
0.011 ( ): perf_bpf_probe:prog:(ffffffff8f260da0) filename=0x7f805b678e37)
0.000 ( 0.016 ms): touch/9034 ... [continued]: open()) = 3
0.034 ( 0.002 ms): touch/9034 open(filename: 0x5b87c640, flags: CLOEXEC ) ...
0.036 ( ): __bpf_stdout__:/lib64/libc.so.6....)
0.037 ( ): perf_bpf_probe:prog:(ffffffff8f260da0) filename=0x7f805b87c640)
0.034 ( 0.009 ms): touch/9034 ... [continued]: open()) = 3
0.251 ( 0.002 ms): touch/9034 open(filename: 0x5b422c70, flags: CLOEXEC ) ...
0.253 ( ): __bpf_stdout__:/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive......)
0.254 ( ): perf_bpf_probe:prog:(ffffffff8f260da0) filename=0x7f805b422c70)
0.251 ( 0.009 ms): touch/9034 ... [continued]: open()) = 3
0.296 ( 0.002 ms): touch/9034 open(filename: 0x1d3a00f1, flags: CREAT|NOCTTY|NONBLOCK|WRONLY, mode: IRUGO|IWUGO) ...
0.298 ( ): __bpf_stdout__:/tmp/Thanks.Yonghong.Song!..)
0.299 ( ): perf_bpf_probe:prog:(ffffffff8f260da0) filename=0x7ffd1d3a00f1)
0.296 ( 0.009 ms): touch/9034 ... [continued]: open()) = 3
[root@...et bpf]#
Powered by blists - more mailing lists