lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:53:41 +0800
From:   Kai Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hayeswang@...ltek.co,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8152: disable rx checksum offload on Dell TB dock


> On 23 Nov 2017, at 3:58 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:38:38AM -0500, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> r8153 on Dell TB dock corrupts rx packets.
>> 
>> The root cause is not found yet, but disabling rx checksumming can
>> workaround the issue. We can use this connection to decide if it's
>> a Dell TB dock:
>> Realtek r8153 <-> SMSC hub <-> ASMedia XHCI controller
>> 
>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729674
>> Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@...l.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> index d51d9abf7986..58b80b5e7803 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>> #include <linux/usb/cdc.h>
>> #include <linux/suspend.h>
>> #include <linux/acpi.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +#include <linux/usb/hcd.h>
>> 
>> /* Information for net-next */
>> #define NETNEXT_VERSION		"09"
>> @@ -5135,6 +5137,35 @@ static u8 rtl_get_version(struct usb_interface *intf)
>> 	return version;
>> }
>> 
>> +/* Ethernet on Dell TB 15/16 dock is connected this way:
>> + * Realtek r8153 <-> SMSC hub <-> ASMedia XHCI controller
>> + * We use this connection to make sure r8153 is on the Dell TB dock.
>> + */
>> +static bool check_dell_tb_dock(struct usb_device *udev)
>> +{
>> +	struct usb_device *hub = udev->parent;
>> +	struct usb_device *root_hub;
>> +	struct pci_dev *controller;
>> +
>> +	if (!hub)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	if (!(le16_to_cpu(hub->descriptor.idVendor) == 0x0424 &&
>> +	      le16_to_cpu(hub->descriptor.idProduct) == 0x5537))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	root_hub = hub->parent;
>> +	if (!root_hub || root_hub->parent)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	controller = to_pci_dev(bus_to_hcd(root_hub->bus)->self.controller);
> 
> That's a very scary, and dangerous, cast.  You can not ever be sure that
> the hub really is a "root hub" like this.

What I want to do here is to finding this connection:
Realtek r8153 <-> SMSC hub (USD ID: 0424:5537) <-> 
ASMedia XHCI controller (PCI ID: 1b21:1142).

Is there a safer way to do this?

> 
>> +	if (controller->vendor == 0x1b21 && controller->device == 0x1142)
>> +		return true;
> 
> Why can't you just look at the USB device itself and go off of a quirk
> in it?  Something like a version or string or something else?

I have a r8153 <-> USB 3.0 dongle which work just fine. I can’t find any 
information to differentiate them. Hence I want to use the connection to
identify if r8153 is on a Dell TB dock.

> 
> This sounds like a USB host controller issue, not a USB device issue,
> can't we fix the "real" problem here instead of this crazy work-around?

Yes. From what I know, ASMedia is working on it, but not sure how long it
will take. In the meantime, I’d like to workaround this issue for the users.

> Odds are any device plugged into the hub should have the same issue,
> right?

Actually no.
I just plugged r8153 dongle into the same hub, surprisingly the issue
doesn’t happen in this scenario.

Kai-Heng

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists