netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJpBn1x-RwfDSrjxpGv3NJ9yOfFCmzg_1EFXTkHtdtNbDAG8+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Nov 2017 23:49:17 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 4/6] netdevsim: add software driver for testing offloads

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:36:11AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>>To be able to run selftests without any hardware required we
>>need a software model.  The model can also serve as an example
>>implementation for those implementing actual HW offloads.
>>The dummy driver have previously been extended to test SR-IOV,
>>but the general consensus seems to be against adding further
>>features to it.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
>>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
>>---
>
> [...]
>
>
>>+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/netdev.c
>>@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
>>+/*
>>+ * Copyright (C) 2017 Netronome Systems, Inc.
>>+ *
>>+ * This software is dual licensed under the GNU General License Version 2,
>>+ * June 1991 as shown in the file COPYING in the top-level directory of this
>>+ * source tree or the BSD 2-Clause License provided below.  You have the
>>+ * option to license this software under the complete terms of either license.
>>+ *
>>+ * The BSD 2-Clause License:
>
> Why gpl2 is not enough for this?

It's the license I got from legal, I will request permission to use
pure gpl2.  Thanks!