lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:38:34 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 08/12] rxrpc: Express protocol timeouts in terms of
 RTT

Express protocol timeouts for data retransmission and deferred ack
generation in terms on RTT rather than specified timeouts once we have
sufficient RTT samples.

For the moment, this requires just one RTT sample to be able to use this
for ack deferral and two for data retransmission.

The data retransmission timeout is set at RTT*1.5 and the ACK deferral
timeout is set at RTT.

Note that the calculated timeout is limited to a minimum of 4ns to make
sure it doesn't happen too quickly.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/call_event.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++----
 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c    |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index c14395d5ad8c..da91f16ac77c 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void __rxrpc_propose_ACK(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 ack_reason,
 				enum rxrpc_propose_ack_trace why)
 {
 	enum rxrpc_propose_ack_outcome outcome = rxrpc_propose_ack_use;
-	unsigned long now, ack_at, expiry = rxrpc_soft_ack_delay;
+	unsigned long expiry = rxrpc_soft_ack_delay;
 	s8 prior = rxrpc_ack_priority[ack_reason];
 
 	/* Pings are handled specially because we don't want to accidentally
@@ -116,7 +116,13 @@ static void __rxrpc_propose_ACK(struct rxrpc_call *call, u8 ack_reason,
 		    background)
 			rxrpc_queue_call(call);
 	} else {
-		now = jiffies;
+		unsigned long now = jiffies, ack_at;
+
+		if (call->peer->rtt_usage > 0)
+			ack_at = nsecs_to_jiffies(call->peer->rtt);
+		else
+			ack_at = expiry;
+
 		ack_at = jiffies + expiry;
 		if (time_before(ack_at, call->ack_at)) {
 			WRITE_ONCE(call->ack_at, ack_at);
@@ -160,14 +166,22 @@ static void rxrpc_resend(struct rxrpc_call *call, unsigned long now_j)
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	unsigned long resend_at;
 	rxrpc_seq_t cursor, seq, top;
-	ktime_t now, max_age, oldest, ack_ts;
+	ktime_t now, max_age, oldest, ack_ts, timeout, min_timeo;
 	int ix;
 	u8 annotation, anno_type, retrans = 0, unacked = 0;
 
 	_enter("{%d,%d}", call->tx_hard_ack, call->tx_top);
 
+	if (call->peer->rtt_usage > 1)
+		timeout = ns_to_ktime(call->peer->rtt * 3 / 2);
+	else
+		timeout = ms_to_ktime(rxrpc_resend_timeout);
+	min_timeo = ns_to_ktime((1000000000 / HZ) * 4);
+	if (ktime_before(timeout, min_timeo))
+		timeout = min_timeo;
+
 	now = ktime_get_real();
-	max_age = ktime_sub_ms(now, rxrpc_resend_timeout * 1000 / HZ);
+	max_age = ktime_sub(now, timeout);
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
 
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
index 03e0676db28c..c56ee54fdd1f 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -226,6 +226,13 @@ static void rxrpc_queue_packet(struct rxrpc_sock *rx, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 	} else {
 		unsigned long now = jiffies, resend_at;
 
+		if (call->peer->rtt_usage > 1)
+			resend_at = nsecs_to_jiffies(call->peer->rtt * 3 / 2);
+		else
+			resend_at = rxrpc_resend_timeout;
+		if (resend_at < 1)
+			resend_at = 1;
+
 		resend_at = now + rxrpc_resend_timeout;
 		WRITE_ONCE(call->resend_at, resend_at);
 		rxrpc_reduce_call_timer(call, resend_at, now,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists