netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2] drop support for DECnet

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:28:23 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] drop support for DECnet

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:04:45 +0900 (KST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:01:51 -0800
> 
> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:19:21 -0500 (EST)
> > David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >   
> >> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:11:18 -0800
> >>   
> >> > Nothing has been done in Linux to maintain DECnet
> >> > for years. The code is buggy and does not support net namespace.
> >> > This patch removes all support of it from iproute2
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>    
> >> 
> >> Even if decnet had been moved to staging/ (which it hasn't) I'd say
> >> this is entirely premature Stephen.
> >> 
> >> As long as the decnet code is upstream, you can't just yank away
> >> support from the tooling.  
> > 
> > I agree that it is probably too early to remove support completely.
> > Instead, why not just mark IPX and DecNET as deprecated and warn users
> > for a couple of releases.  
> 
> People are using decnet.
> 
> Last time I broke it there were users who complained.

What about IPX?