[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171127122638.GB3473@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:26:38 -0200
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] sctp: abandon the whole msg if one part of a
fragmented message is abandoned
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 09:18:35PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> As rfc3758#section-3.1 demands:
>
> A3) When a TSN is "abandoned", if it is part of a fragmented message,
> all other TSN's within that fragmented message MUST be abandoned
> at the same time.
>
> Besides, if it couldn't handle this, the rest frags would never get
> assembled in peer side.
>
> This patch supports it by adding abandoned flag in sctp_datamsg, when
> one chunk is being abandoned, set chunk->msg->abandoned as well. Next
> time when checking for abandoned, go checking chunk->msg->abandoned
> first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 3 ++-
> net/sctp/chunk.c | 7 +++++++
> net/sctp/outqueue.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 16f949e..2f8f93d 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
> /* Did the messenge fail to send? */
> int send_error;
> u8 send_failed:1,
> - can_delay; /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
> + can_delay:1, /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
> + abandoned:1; /* should this message be abandoned */
> };
>
> struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *,
> diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> index 7b261af..9213805 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
> msg->send_failed = 0;
> msg->send_error = 0;
> msg->can_delay = 1;
> + msg->abandoned = 0;
> msg->expires_at = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
> }
> @@ -304,6 +305,9 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> return 0;
>
> + if (chunk->msg->abandoned)
> + return 1;
> +
> if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> struct sctp_stream_out *streamout =
> @@ -316,6 +320,7 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> chunk->asoc->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(TTL)]++;
> streamout->ext->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(TTL)]++;
> }
> + chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
> return 1;
> } else if (SCTP_PR_RTX_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
> @@ -324,10 +329,12 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
>
> chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
> streamout->ext->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
> + chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
> return 1;
> } else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> chunk->msg->expires_at &&
> time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> + chunk->msg->abandoned = 1;
> return 1;
> }
> /* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> index 7029f8b..4ab164b 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> @@ -364,10 +364,12 @@ static int sctp_prsctp_prune_sent(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> list_for_each_entry_safe(chk, temp, queue, transmitted_list) {
> struct sctp_stream_out *streamout;
>
> - if (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
> - chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive)
> + if (!chk->msg->abandoned &&
> + (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
> + chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive))
> continue;
>
> + chk->msg->abandoned = 1;
> list_del_init(&chk->transmitted_list);
> sctp_insert_list(&asoc->outqueue.abandoned,
> &chk->transmitted_list);
> @@ -404,10 +406,12 @@ static int sctp_prsctp_prune_unsent(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> q->sched->unsched_all(&asoc->stream);
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(chk, temp, &q->out_chunk_list, list) {
> - if (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
> - chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive)
> + if (!chk->msg->abandoned &&
> + (!SCTP_PR_PRIO_ENABLED(chk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) ||
> + chk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive <= sinfo->sinfo_timetolive))
> continue;
>
> + chk->msg->abandoned = 1;
> sctp_sched_dequeue_common(q, chk);
> asoc->sent_cnt_removable--;
> asoc->abandoned_unsent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(PRIO)]++;
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists