[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1711292113350.7808@localhost>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:26:36 +1100 (AEDT)
From: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
cc: selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: [BUG] kernel stack corruption during/after Netlabel error
I'm seeing a kernel stack corruption bug (detected via gcc) when running
the SELinux testsuite on a 4.15-rc1 kernel, in the 2nd inet_socket test:
https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite/blob/master/tests/inet_socket/test
# Verify that unauthorized client cannot communicate with the server.
$result = system
"runcon -t test_inet_bad_client_t -- $basedir/client stream 127.0.0.1 65535 2>&1";
This correctlly causes an access control error in the Netlabel code, and
the bug seems to be triggered during the ICMP send:
[ 339.806024] SELinux: failure in selinux_parse_skb(), unable to parse packet
[ 339.822505] Kernel panic - not syncing: stack-protector: Kernel stack is corrupted in: ffffffff81745af5
[ 339.822505]
[ 339.852250] CPU: 4 PID: 3642 Comm: client Not tainted 4.15.0-rc1-test #15
[ 339.868498] Hardware name: LENOVO 10FGS0VA1L/30BC, BIOS FWKT68A 01/19/2017
[ 339.885060] Call Trace:
[ 339.896875] <IRQ>
[ 339.908103] dump_stack+0x63/0x87
[ 339.920645] panic+0xe8/0x248
[ 339.932668] ? ip_push_pending_frames+0x33/0x40
[ 339.946328] ? icmp_send+0x525/0x530
[ 339.958861] ? kfree_skbmem+0x60/0x70
[ 339.971431] __stack_chk_fail+0x1b/0x20
[ 339.984049] icmp_send+0x525/0x530
[ 339.996205] ? netlbl_skbuff_err+0x36/0x40
[ 340.008997] ? selinux_netlbl_err+0x11/0x20
[ 340.021816] ? selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x211/0x230
[ 340.035529] ? security_sock_rcv_skb+0x3b/0x50
[ 340.048471] ? sk_filter_trim_cap+0x44/0x1c0
[ 340.061246] ? tcp_v4_inbound_md5_hash+0x69/0x1b0
[ 340.074562] ? tcp_filter+0x2c/0x40
[ 340.086400] ? tcp_v4_rcv+0x820/0xa20
[ 340.098329] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x71/0x1a0
[ 340.111279] ? ip_local_deliver+0x6f/0xe0
[ 340.123535] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x3a0/0x3a0
[ 340.135523] ? ip_rcv_finish+0xdb/0x3a0
[ 340.147442] ? ip_rcv+0x27c/0x3c0
[ 340.158668] ? inet_del_offload+0x40/0x40
[ 340.170580] ? __netif_receive_skb_core+0x4ac/0x900
[ 340.183285] ? rcu_accelerate_cbs+0x5b/0x80
[ 340.195282] ? __netif_receive_skb+0x18/0x60
[ 340.207288] ? process_backlog+0x95/0x140
[ 340.218948] ? net_rx_action+0x26c/0x3b0
[ 340.230416] ? __do_softirq+0xc9/0x26a
[ 340.241625] ? do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
[ 340.253368] </IRQ>
[ 340.262673] ? do_softirq+0x50/0x60
[ 340.273450] ? __local_bh_enable_ip+0x57/0x60
[ 340.285045] ? ip_finish_output2+0x175/0x350
[ 340.296403] ? ip_finish_output+0x127/0x1d0
[ 340.307665] ? nf_hook_slow+0x3c/0xb0
[ 340.318230] ? ip_output+0x72/0xe0
[ 340.328524] ? ip_fragment.constprop.54+0x80/0x80
[ 340.340070] ? ip_local_out+0x35/0x40
[ 340.350497] ? ip_queue_xmit+0x15c/0x3f0
[ 340.361060] ? __kmalloc_reserve.isra.40+0x31/0x90
[ 340.372484] ? __skb_clone+0x2e/0x130
[ 340.382633] ? tcp_transmit_skb+0x558/0xa10
[ 340.393262] ? tcp_connect+0x938/0xad0
[ 340.403370] ? ktime_get_with_offset+0x4c/0xb0
[ 340.414206] ? tcp_v4_connect+0x457/0x4e0
[ 340.424471] ? __inet_stream_connect+0xb3/0x300
[ 340.435195] ? inet_stream_connect+0x3b/0x60
[ 340.445607] ? SYSC_connect+0xd9/0x110
[ 340.455455] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0xaf/0x100
[ 340.466112] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1d0/0x2b0
[ 340.476636] ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x209/0x290
[ 340.487151] ? SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
[ 340.496453] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x1b0
[ 340.506078] ? entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
[ 340.516693] Kernel Offset: disabled
[ 340.526393] Rebooting in 11 seconds..
This is mostly reliable, and I'm only seeing it on bare metal (not in a
virtualbox vm).
The SELinux skb parse error at the start only sometimes appears, and
looking at the code, I suspect some kind of memory corruption being the
cause at that point (basic packet header checks).
I bisected the bug down to the following change:
commit bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Tue Sep 19 05:14:24 2017 -0700
net: sk_buff rbnode reorg
...
Anyone else able to reproduce this, or have any ideas on what's happening?
- James
--
James Morris
<james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists