netdev - [PATCH net 1/4] sfp: fix RX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1eKPMt-0005HI-Ct@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 13:59:11 +0000
From:   Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/4] sfp: fix RX_LOS signal handling

The options word is a be16 quantity, so we need to test the flags
having converted the endian-ness.  Convert the flag bits to be16,
which can be optimised by the compiler, rather than converting a
variable at runtime.

Reported-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
 drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index e381811e5f11..3355141688a6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void sfp_sm_link_check_los(struct sfp *sfp)
 	 * SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL are set?  For now, we assume
 	 * the same as SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_NORMAL set.
 	 */
-	if (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED)
+	if (sfp->id.ext.options & cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED))
 		los ^= SFP_F_LOS;
 
 	if (los)
@@ -582,7 +582,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_event(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
 		if (event == SFP_E_TX_FAULT)
 			sfp_sm_fault(sfp, true);
 		else if (event ==
-			 (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED ?
+			 (sfp->id.ext.options &
+			  cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) ?
 			  SFP_E_LOS_HIGH : SFP_E_LOS_LOW))
 			sfp_sm_link_up(sfp);
 		break;
@@ -592,7 +593,8 @@ static void sfp_sm_event(struct sfp *sfp, unsigned int event)
 			sfp_sm_link_down(sfp);
 			sfp_sm_fault(sfp, true);
 		} else if (event ==
-			   (sfp->id.ext.options & SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED ?
+			   (sfp->id.ext.options &
+			    cpu_to_be16(SFP_OPTIONS_LOS_INVERTED) ?
 			    SFP_E_LOS_LOW : SFP_E_LOS_HIGH)) {
 			sfp_sm_link_down(sfp);
 			sfp_sm_next(sfp, SFP_S_WAIT_LOS, 0);
-- 
2.7.4