[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171203170312.rvjo6ifl2pgpjkcs@ast-mbp>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 09:03:14 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] perf: prepare perf_event.h for new types
perf_kprobe and perf_uprobe
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:50:18PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> Two new perf types, perf_kprobe and perf_uprobe, will be added to allow
> creating [k,u]probe with perf_event_open. These [k,u]probe are associated
> with the file decriptor created by perf_event_open, thus are easy to
> clean when the file descriptor is destroyed.
>
> kprobe_func and uprobe_path are added to union config1 for pointers to
> function name for kprobe or binary path for uprobe.
>
> kprobe_addr and probe_offset are added to union config2 for kernel
> address (when kprobe_func is NULL), or [k,u]probe offset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 362493a..247c6cb 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -299,6 +299,8 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4 104 /* add: sample_regs_intr */
> #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER5 112 /* add: aux_watermark */
>
> +#define MAX_PROBE_FUNC_NAME_LEN 64
I think we have to remove this restriction.
There are already functions with names longer than 64 characters
in the current vmlinux:
trace_event_define_fields_ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized_fastpath
trace_event_define_fields_mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_begin_template
How about we drop this restriction and use NAME_MAX internally
without adding new uapi defines ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists