[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171204.115757.1176520446961809221.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:57:57 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fw@...len.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next-next 0/4] rtnetlink: rework handler (un)registering
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:53:04 +0100
> The only difference is that theoretically some addrlabel rtnetlink
> ops are not available if registration fails, but thats not really worse
> than before as this used to panic() instead :-)
>
> I can send a followup patch, to convert all of ipv6, should be easy
> to propagate errors from addrlabel initialisation to its callsite.
Yes, please make ipv6 consistent in this area when you get a chance.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists