lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512489430.21892.3.camel@baylibre.com>
Date:   Tue, 05 Dec 2017 16:57:10 +0100
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: meson-gxl: cleanup by defining the
 control registers

On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 23:23 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote:
> > +static inline int meson_gxl_write_reg(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > +                                   unsigned int bank, unsigned int reg,
> > +                                   uint16_t value)
> > +{
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     /* Enable Analog and DSP register Bank access by
> > +      * toggling TSTCNTL_TEST_MODE bit in the TSTCNTL register
> > +      */
> > +     ret = phy_write(phydev, TSTCNTL, 0);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto out;
> > +     ret = phy_write(phydev, TSTCNTL, TSTCNTL_TEST_MODE);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto out;
> > +     ret = phy_write(phydev, TSTCNTL, 0);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto out;
> > +     ret = phy_write(phydev, TSTCNTL, TSTCNTL_TEST_MODE);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto out;
> > +
> 
> how about just do the above enable procedure once?
> from the datasheet, the access won't be disabled if don't reset, or
> write to register TSTCNTL with TEST_MODE=0

It just seems more clean. This is way, the write function is self sufficient and
we can use it w/o making assumption about what happened out of it.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ