[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <964bce1a-4f18-575e-1274-e5c2d877b706@skidata.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:06:36 +0100
From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@...data.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Richard Leitner <dev@...l1n.net>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<fugang.duan@....com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<frowand.list@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<baruch@...s.co.il>, <david.wu@...k-chips.com>, <lukma@...x.de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] phylib: Add device reset delay support
Hi Andrew,
On 12/05/2017 06:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_mdio.c
>> @@ -77,6 +77,14 @@ static int of_mdiobus_register_phy(struct mii_bus *mdio,
>> if (of_property_read_bool(child, "broken-turn-around"))
>> mdio->phy_ignore_ta_mask |= 1 << addr;
>>
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-delay-us",
>> + &phy->mdio.reset_delay))
>> + phy->mdio.reset_delay = 0;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-post-delay-us",
>> + &phy->mdio.reset_post_delay))
>> + phy->mdio.reset_post_delay = 0;
>
> of_property_read_u32() should not change the variable you pass to it,
> if it does not find the property. So you can change this to:
>
> phy->mdio.reset_delay = 0;
> phy->mdio.reset_post_delay = 0;
>
> of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-delay-us",
> &phy->mdio.reset_delay);
>
> of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-post-delay-us",
> &phy->mdio.reset_post_delay);
Geert already pointed this out, but he said it's possible to omit also
the zeroing of the variables.
> On 12/05/2017 02:54 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> If of_property_read_u32() fails, it doesn't write to its output
>> parameter.
>> As the structure should be zeroed during allocation, you can just
>> write:
>>
>> of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-delay-us",&phy->mdio.reset_delay);
>> of_property_read_u32(child, "reset-post-delay-us",
>> &phy->mdio.reset_post_delay);
If that's ok I'll take the shorter (Geerts) suggestion for v4.
Nonetheless thanks for your quick feedback!
regards;Richard.L
Powered by blists - more mailing lists