netdev - Re: [PATCH][next] netdevsim: make functions nsim_bpf_create_prog and nsim_bpf_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171205.143827.1200817158476092630.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Tue, 05 Dec 2017 14:38:27 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     colin.king@...onical.com
Cc:     jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] netdevsim: make functions nsim_bpf_create_prog
 and nsim_bpf_destroy_prog static

From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Date: Mon,  4 Dec 2017 12:56:09 +0000

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> Functions nsim_bpf_create_prog and nsim_bpf_destroy_prog are local to the
> source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warnings:
> symbol 'nsim_bpf_create_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
> symbol 'nsim_bpf_destroy_prog' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Applied, thanks.