[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171205.184102.1062890615816527656.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 18:41:02 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] make sock_alloc_file() do sock_release() on
failures
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:29:09 +0000
> This changes calling conventions (and simplifies the hell out
> the callers). New rules: once struct socket had been passed
> to sock_alloc_file(), it's been consumed either by struct file
> or by sock_release() done by sock_alloc_file(). Either way
> the caller should not do sock_release() after that point.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists