[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <491f96ed-9394-dd2f-9af8-435159eed347@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 09:20:33 +0100
From: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: "rwarsow@....de" <rwarsow@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in e1000e since Kernel 4.14.3
On 05.12.2017 07:19, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:18:34AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:47:10AM +0100, Gabriel C wrote:
>>> On 04.12.2017 23:10, rwarsow@....de wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hallo
>>>>
>>>> someone and I got an regression with e1000e since kernel 4.14.3 and it seems there is 4.14.4 on the way without a fix.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> bug report is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
>>>
>>> ( added stable and netdev to CC )
>>>
>>> Yes I have a box with e1000e and it seems something at least breaks NM after 4.14.3.
>>
>> Again, can people try 4.14.5-rc1? It should be resolved there.
>
> Oops, that would be 4.14.4-rc1. Any why do you say above that is on the
> way without a fix, did you test it?
I didn't tested 4.14.4-rc1 but somone from the bug report tested it and told is not resolved.
I'll fire up an build in a bit and let you know.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists