netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] gianfar: fix a flooded alignment reports because of padding issue.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06a8b0a9-c8fc-ee9b-6f82-09a594892f28@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Dec 2017 08:24:46 +0800
From:   Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@...il.com>
To:     Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gianfar: fix a flooded alignment reports because of
 padding issue.

On 12/05/2017 12:06 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zumeng Chen [mailto:zumeng.chen@...il.com]
>> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 5:22 AM
>> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>; davem@...emloft.net
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gianfar: fix a flooded alignment reports because of padding
>> issue.
>>
>> According to LS1021A RM, the value of PAL can be set so that the start of the
>> IP header in the receive data buffer is aligned to a 32-bit boundary. Normally,
>> setting PAL = 2 provides minimal padding to ensure such alignment of the IP
>> header.
>>
>> However every incoming packet's 8-byte time stamp will be inserted into the
>> packet data buffer as padding alignment bytes when hardware time stamping is
>> enabled.
>>
>> So we set the padding 8+2 here to avoid the flooded alignment faults:
>>
>> root@128:~# cat /proc/cpu/alignment
>> User:           0
>> System:         17539 (inet_gro_receive+0x114/0x2c0)
>> Skipped:        0
>> Half:           0
>> Word:           0
>> DWord:          0
>> Multi:          17539
>> User faults:    2 (fixup)
>>
> [...]
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> index e616b71..e47945f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> @@ -1413,9 +1413,11 @@ static int gfar_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>
>> 	gfar_init_addr_hash_table(priv);
>>
>> -	/* Insert receive time stamps into padding alignment bytes */
>> +	/* Insert receive time stamps into padding alignment bytes, and
>> +	 * plus 2 bytes padding to ensure the cpu alignment.
>> +	 */
>> 	if (priv->device_flags & FSL_GIANFAR_DEV_HAS_TIMER)
>> -		priv->padding = 8;
>> +		priv->padding = 8 + DEFAULT_PADDING;
>>
>> 	if (dev->features & NETIF_F_IP_CSUM ||
>> 	    priv->device_flags & FSL_GIANFAR_DEV_HAS_TIMER)
>> --
>> 2.5.0
> Why handle only the rx timestamp path (HAS_TIMER) when the issue, as presented
> by you, should be applicable to the default path as well?
>
> The code change according to the patch description should be more likely:
>
> +       priv->padding = DEFAULT_PADDING;
>          /* Insert receive time stamps into padding alignment bytes */
>          if (priv->device_flags & FSL_GIANFAR_DEV_HAS_TIMER)
> -               priv->padding = 8;
> +               priv->padding += 8;

En, seems more reasonable and clear, feel free to merge it if 
convenience, thanks :-)

>
> Do you have any performance numbers for this change?

No performance testing since just padding issue but with
the clear sky of /proc/cpu/alignment in arm side.

Cheers,
Zumeng

>
> Thanks,
> Claudiu