[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171206.155005.2230253778373071462.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 15:50:05 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: tehnerd@...com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, vnuorval@....hut.fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] adding missing rcu_read_unlock in ipxip6_rcv
From: "Nikita V. Shirokov" <tehnerd@...com>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:19:33 -0800
> commit 8d79266bc48c ("ip6_tunnel: add collect_md mode to IPv6 tunnels")
> introduced new exit point in ipxip6_rcv. however rcu_read_unlock is
> missing there. this diff is fixing this
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikita V. Shirokov <tehnerd@...com>
...
> @@ -903,8 +903,10 @@ static int ipxip6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 ipproto,
> goto drop;
> if (t->parms.collect_md) {
> tun_dst = ipv6_tun_rx_dst(skb, 0, 0, 0);
> - if (!tun_dst)
> + if (!tun_dst) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> return 0;
> + }
> }
> ret = __ip6_tnl_rcv(t, skb, tpi, tun_dst, dscp_ecn_decapsulate,
> log_ecn_error);
Shouldn't it branch to 'drop' otherwise we leak the skb?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists