netdev - Re: [PATCH V11 3/5] printk: hash addresses printed with %p

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy4qnm3m5QupLMcp-8k0yz6E_-ug6rE-1aerpEQObYcLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:28:22 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "me@...in.cc" <me@...in.cc>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "Jason@...c4.com" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "tytso@....edu" <tytso@....edu>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "tycho@...ho.ws" <tycho@...ho.ws>,
        "william.c.roberts@...el.com" <william.c.roberts@...el.com>,
        "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
        "Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch" <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
        "ijc@...lion.org.uk" <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
        "sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com" <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "wilal.deacon@....com" <wilal.deacon@....com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "cfries@...gle.com" <cfries@...gle.com>,
        "olorin@...gle.com" <olorin@...gle.com>,
        "danielmicay@...il.com" <danielmicay@...il.com>,
        "tixxdz@...il.com" <tixxdz@...il.com>,
        "rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "aryabinin@...tuozzo.com" <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        "glider@...gle.com" <glider@...gle.com>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com" 
        <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 3/5] printk: hash addresses printed with %p

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:31 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can also image issues where you want to know whether 2 pointers point
>> into the same structure (like an skb).
>
> This is already retained due to the hashing. i.e. the same pointer
> value will produce the same hash value, so that kind of direct
> comparison still works.

DavidL isn't talking about the _same_ pointer, he's talking about it
being offset from the same base.

But realistically, I don't think we ever hash things like that anyway.

Things like that do show up in register dumps etc during oopses, but
those aren't hashed.

            Linus