[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171206014704.3796-1-bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:47:04 +0900
From: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] rds: debug: fix null check on static array
t_name cannot be NULL since it is an array field of a struct.
Replacing null check on static array with string length check using
strnlen()
Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@....ntt.co.jp>
---
net/rds/connection.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/connection.c b/net/rds/connection.c
index 9efc82c665b5..6492c0b608a4 100644
--- a/net/rds/connection.c
+++ b/net/rds/connection.c
@@ -230,8 +230,8 @@ static struct rds_connection *__rds_conn_create(struct net *net,
rdsdebug("allocated conn %p for %pI4 -> %pI4 over %s %s\n",
conn, &laddr, &faddr,
- trans->t_name ? trans->t_name : "[unknown]",
- is_outgoing ? "(outgoing)" : "");
+ strnlen(trans->t_name, sizeof(trans->t_name)) ? trans->t_name :
+ "[unknown]", is_outgoing ? "(outgoing)" : "");
/*
* Since we ran without holding the conn lock, someone could
--
2.13.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists