[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1512661332.7042.5.camel@baylibre.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:42:12 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/8] net: phy: meson-gxl: detect LPA
corruption
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 16:34 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 03:27:12PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > The purpose of this change is to fix the incorrect detection of the link
> > partner (LP) advertised capabilities which sometimes happens with this PHY
> > (roughly 1 time in a dozen)
>
> Hi Jerome
>
> Since this is a real fix, please send it alone. Base it on net, not
> net-next. David will then get it applied to stable, so it will be
> backported.
I hesitated on this. For this fix to be "not too ugly" I need at least the
helper functions (patch 1 to 3) ... which are not really fixes.
Would it be Ok if send patches 1 to 5 to net ?
and 6 to 8 separately on net-next ?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists