[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ca21c61e82a44daa29226eac54a4950@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:06:04 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Xin Long' <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 net-next 04/12] sctp: implement make_datafrag for
sctp_stream_interleave
From: Xin Long
> Sent: 08 December 2017 13:04
...
> @@ -264,8 +264,8 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> frag |= SCTP_DATA_SACK_IMM;
> }
>
> - chunk = sctp_make_datafrag_empty(asoc, sinfo, len, frag,
> - 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + chunk = asoc->stream.si->make_datafrag(asoc, sinfo, len, frag,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
I know that none of the sctp code is very optimised, but that indirect
call is going to be horrid.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists