netdev - Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 8 Dec 2017 03:17:40 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Stefan Tatschner <rumpelsepp@...enbyte.org>
Cc:     Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WireGuard Upstreaming Roadmap (November 2017)

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Stefan Tatschner
<rumpelsepp@...enbyte.org> wrote:
> I have a question which is related to the involved crypto. As far as I
> have understood the protocol and the concept of wireguard
> What's your opinion on this?

This thread has been picked up on the WireGuard mailing list, not here.

Since this concerns the interworkings of the protocol and cryptography
as a whole, as opposed to implementation details of Linux, please do
not send these inquiries to LKML. Additionally, please start new
threads for new topics in the future, rather than hijacking a roadmap
thread.

Look for my answer on the other mailing list. I'll CC you too.

Regards,
Jason