[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171208064702.GA26061@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 07:47:02 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
f.fainelli@...il.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
ronye@...lanox.com, jiri@...lanox.com, nbd@....name,
john@...ozen.org, kubakici@...pl, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next RFC,v2 1/6] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add
IPS_OFFLOAD status bit
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> index dc947e59d03a..6b463b88182d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
> @@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ enum ip_conntrack_status {
> IPS_HELPER_BIT = 13,
> IPS_HELPER = (1 << IPS_HELPER_BIT),
>
> + /* Conntrack has been offloaded to flow table. */
> + IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT = 14,
> + IPS_OFFLOAD = (1 << IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT),
> +
> /* Be careful here, modifying these bits can make things messy,
> * so don't let users modify them directly.
> */
I think this new bit has to be added to the UNCHANGEABLE mask below.
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index 01130392b7c0..02e195accd47 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -901,6 +901,9 @@ static unsigned int early_drop_list(struct net *net,
> hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(h, n, head, hnnode) {
> tmp = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
>
> + if (test_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &tmp->status))
> + continue;
> +
nit: I would move this below the ASSURED bit check, AFAIU most
(all?) offloaded conntracks are not in ASSURED state since they never
see two-way communication but in case we've mixed flows or no offloading
in place then the ASSURED check takes care of skipping earlydrop
already.
> +/* Set an arbitrary timeout large enough not to ever expire, this save
> + * us a check for the IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT from the packet path via
> + * nf_ct_is_expired().
> + */
> +static void nf_ct_offload_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct)
> +{
> + ct->timeout = nfct_time_stamp + DAY;
> +}
Not sure if its worth adding a test to avoid unconditional write,
e.g. something like
> +static void nf_ct_offload_timeout(struct nf_conn *ct)
> +{
if (nf_ct_expires(ct) < DAY/2))
> + ct->timeout = nfct_time_stamp + DAY;
but perhaps not worth it, gc_worker is infrequent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists