netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] sctp: Add ip option support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:08:04 -0200
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@...nternet.com>
Cc:     selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        paul@...l-moore.com, vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
        sds@...ho.nsa.gov, eparis@...isplace.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] sctp: Add ip option support

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:08:00PM -0200, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 07:31:21PM +0000, Richard Haines wrote:
> ...
> > --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> > +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> > @@ -3123,8 +3123,10 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_maxseg(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, unsigned
> >  
> >  	if (asoc) {
> >  		if (val == 0) {
> > +			struct sctp_af *af = sp->pf->af;
> >  			val = asoc->pathmtu;
> > -			val -= sp->pf->af->net_header_len;
> > +			val -= af->ip_options_len(asoc->base.sk);
> > +			val -= af->net_header_len;
> >  			val -= sizeof(struct sctphdr) +
> >  					sizeof(struct sctp_data_chunk);
> >  		}
> 
> Right below here there is a call to sctp_frag_point(). That function
> also needs this tweak.
> 
> Yes, we should simplify all these calculations. I have a patch to use
> sctp_frag_point on where it is currently recalculating it on
> sctp_datamsg_from_user(), but probably should include other places as
> well.

I have no further comments on this patchset other than the above and
LGTM.
Thanks Richard.

  Marcelo