[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c938dafb-e2a8-ff75-4ef3-cbd1ea62f8dc@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 08:28:17 -0800
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: check for xdo_dev_state_free
On 12/13/2017 10:20 PM, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57:22PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
>> The current XFRM code assumes that we've implemented the
>> xdo_dev_state_free() callback, even if it is meaningless to the driver.
<snip>
>> + if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM) {
>> + netdev_err(dev, "NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM without NETIF_F_HW_ESP\n");
>> + return NOTIFY_BAD;
>> + } else {
>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!(dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
>> + dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add &&
>> + dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)) {
>> + netdev_err(dev, "add or delete function missing from xfrmdev_ops\n");
>
> Please remove these error printings, this is not relevant for normal
> users.
>
Okay.
After I posted this I realized this really should be two patches, so
I'll split this up as well before resending.
sln
Powered by blists - more mailing lists