[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171214173934.GA10610@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:39:34 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@...mai.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix handling of verdicts after NF_QUEUE
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:30:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I'd appreciate if you can take this patch into 4.9-stable. There is no
> similar patch in tree, so this is not a backport.
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:33:37PM -0500, Debabrata Banerjee wrote:
> > A verdict of NF_STOLEN after NF_QUEUE will cause an incorrect return value
> > and a potential kernel panic via double free of skb's
> >
> > This was broken by commit 7034b566a4e7 ("netfilter: fix nf_queue handling")
> > and subsequently fixed in v4.10 by commit c63cbc460419 ("netfilter:
> > use switch() to handle verdict cases from nf_hook_slow()"). However that
> > commit cannot be cleanly cherry-picked to v4.9
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@...mai.com>
>
> Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
>
> Thanks a lot!
Now applied, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists