[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1780732.fBLghQceHc@bentobox>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:48:39 +0100
From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@...nmesh.com>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@...ts.open-mesh.org
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [RFC v2 2/6] batman-adv: Rename batman-adv.h to batadv_genl.h
On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 11:32:05 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2017 11:58:14 CET Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> [...]
> > >> > ---
> > >> > MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> > >> > include/uapi/linux/{batman_adv.h => batadv_genl.h} | 6 +++---
> > >>
> > >> This and the previous patch changes uapi. That might break userspace
> > >> applications that rely on it.
> > >
> > > I am not aware of any application because all (alfred, batctl and some gluon
> > > integration) of them currently ship their own copy because distribution didn't
> > > catch up. And this is also the reason why I want to do it now - not later.
> >
> > That assumes that you know all applications, including those not
> > publicly available. It may be true in this instance, but it is not
> > possible to be certain.
>
> I've just talked with Simon. Because you have a problem with these two
> changes, he suggested that I should drop these two patches and merge packet.h
> with the uapi batadv genl header batman_adv.h
No, this is also bad because batman_adv.h is MIT license and packet.h is
GPL-2. So what other name would you suggest for packet.h? batman_adv_packet.h?
Kind regards,
Sven
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists