[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <af887d3f-2cfc-8311-e1c6-bfe5aac1d955@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:55:57 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@...am.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: b53 tags on bpi-r1 (bcm53125)
Hi Jochen,
On 11/23/2017 11:14 AM, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
>> With Broadcom tags (or any type of switch tagging protocol), eth0
>> becomes a conduit interface and no longer a "normal" network device for
>> applications/socket to use. This means that if you were obtaining an IP
>> address through a DHCP client using e.g: dhclient eth0, this now needs
>> to be replaced using dhclient lan1 for instance.
>
> Yes, that's what I would expect.
>
>> If you use the per-port network devices, do you actually see Broadcom
>> tags coming out of these interfaces, or is it just when you use eth0
>> like what you used before that you see that happening?
>
> For outgoing Packet, I see the tags on eth0, that's expected, but also
> an a laptop connected to any of the external ports (no matter which one,
> wan or lan1-4).
> Incoming packets are seen on eth0 untagged and don't get forwarded to
> the corresponding child Interface.>
> So it seems the switch operates in dumb forwarding mode.
Humm, what if you comment that part from b53_set_forwarding:
b53_read8(dev, B53_CTRL_PAGE, B53_SWITCH_CTRL, &mgmt);
mgmt |= B53_MII_DUMB_FWDG_EN;
b53_write8(dev, B53_CTRL_PAGE, B53_SWITCH_CTRL, mgmt);
does this help?
>
> I also tried a pull down on LED Port 0 (mii_dumb_fwdg_en), but the
> switch still remains in dumb mode. However, I would have to double check
> I picked the correct pin, the Bpi-r1 schematics is not completely error
> free :-(.
>
> Thanks, Jochen
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists