[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dacf242-7d8d-cb55-7532-63d7ea4e3b51@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:22:30 -0800
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 next-queue 08/10] ixgbe: process the
Tx ipsec offload
On 12/15/2017 12:10 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
[...]
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c: In function 'ixgbe_xmit_frame_ring':
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:8563:11: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'sp'; did you mean 'sk'?
> if (skb->sp && !ixgbe_ipsec_tx(tx_ring, first, &ipsec_tx))
> ^~
> sk
>
> vim +8563 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>
> 8562
>> 8563 if (skb->sp && !ixgbe_ipsec_tx(tx_ring, first, &ipsec_tx))
> 8564 goto out_drop;
Thanks, Mr. Roboto. Obviously an #ifdef is in order around this little
block.
sln
Powered by blists - more mailing lists