lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF=yD-LWyCD4Y0aJ9O0e_CHLR+3JOeKicRRTEVCPxgw4XOcqGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Dec 2017 17:33:36 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@...19freenet.de>
Cc:     Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 4.14 - regression: broken tun/tap / bridge network with
 virtio - bisected

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Andreas Hartmann
<andihartmann@...19freenet.de> wrote:
> On 12/14/2017 at 11:17 PM Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>>> Well, the patch does not fix hanging VMs, which have been shutdown and
>>>> can't be killed any more.
>>>> Because of the stack trace
>>>>
>>>> [<ffffffffc0d0e3c5>] vhost_net_ubuf_put_and_wait+0x35/0x60 [vhost_net]
>>>> [<ffffffffc0d0f264>] vhost_net_ioctl+0x304/0x870 [vhost_net]
>>>> [<ffffffff9b25460f>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x5c0
>>>> [<ffffffff9b254bb4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
>>>> [<ffffffff9b00365b>] do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x100
>>>> [<ffffffff9b78e7ab>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>>>> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
>>>>
>>>> I was hoping, that the problems could be related - but that seems not to
>>>> be true.
>>>
>>> However, it turned out, that reverting the complete patchset "Remove UDP
>>> Fragmentation Offload support" prevent hanging qemu processes.
>>
>> That implies a combination of UFO and vhost zerocopy. Disabling
>> experimental_zcopytx in vhost_net will probably work around the bug
>> then.

I have been able to reproduce the hang by sending a UFO packet
between two guests running v4.13 on a host running v4.15-rc1.

The vhost_net_ubuf_ref refcount indeed hits overflow (-1) from
vhost_zerocopy_callback being called for each segment of a
segmented UFO skb. This refcount is decremented then on each
segment, but incremented only once for the entire UFO skb.

Before v4.14, these packets would be converted in skb_segment to
regular copy packets with skb_orphan_frags and the callback function
called once at this point. v4.14 added support for reference counted
zerocopy skb that can pass through skb_orphan_frags unmodified and
have their zerocopy state safely cloned with skb_zerocopy_clone.

The call to skb_zerocopy_clone must come after skb_orphan_frags
to limit cloning of this state to those skbs that can do so safely.

Please try a host with the following patch. This fixes it for me. I intend to
send it to net.

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index a592ca025fc4..d2d985418819 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3654,8 +3654,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,

                skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |= skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
                                              SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
-               if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
-                       goto err;

                while (pos < offset + len) {
                        if (i >= nfrags) {
@@ -3681,6 +3679,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,

                        if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC)))
                                goto err;
+                       if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
+                               goto err;

                        *nskb_frag = *frag;
                        __skb_frag_ref(nskb_frag);


This is relatively inefficient, as it calls skb_zerocopy_clone for each frag
in the frags[] array. I will follow-up with a patch to net-next that only
checks once per skb:

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 466581cf4cdc..a293a33604ec 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3662,7 +3662,8 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,

                skb_shinfo(nskb)->tx_flags |= skb_shinfo(head_skb)->tx_flags &
                                              SKBTX_SHARED_FRAG;
-               if (skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, head_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
+               if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
+                   skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
                        goto err;

                while (pos < offset + len) {
@@ -3676,6 +3677,11 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,

                                BUG_ON(!nfrags);

+                               if (skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC) ||
+                                   skb_zerocopy_clone(nskb, frag_skb,
+                                                      GFP_ATOMIC))
+                                       goto err;
+
                                list_skb = list_skb->next;
                        }

@@ -3687,9 +3693,6 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
                                goto err;
                        }

-                       if (unlikely(skb_orphan_frags(frag_skb, GFP_ATOMIC)))
-                               goto err;
-

I'll also send to net-next

(1) a patch to convert its vhost_net_ ubuf_ref refcnt to refcount_t

(2) a path to skb_zerocopy_clone to warn on clone if not
     sock_zerocopy_callback

> I already tested it w/ options vhost_net experimental_zcopytx=0 - but
> this didn't "resolve" anything. See
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg203197.html
>
> Therefore, I think your following thoughts are lapsed unfortunately,
> aren't they?

That experiment was perhaps run before commit 0c19f846d582 ("net:
accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet") and hit the other UFO
bug.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ