netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 03/14] i40e: setup xdp_rxq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Dec 2017 14:05:56 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        dsahern@...il.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com,
        "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 03/14] i40e: setup
 xdp_rxq_info

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:52:08 +0100
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com> wrote:

> > +       /* Flow director side channel does not invoke XDP/bpf */
> > +       if (rx_ring->vsi->type == I40E_VSI_FDIR)
> > +               xdp_rxq_info_type(&rx_ring->xdp_rxq, RXQ_TYPE_SINK);  
> 
> For me, it doesn't make sense to expose the FD Rx ring outside the
> scope of i40e driver. Check against VSI_MAIN in setup/cleanup so the
> FD ring is not exposed outside the driver. Maybe you can get rid of
> the RXQ_TYPE_SINK as well then.

Okay, took this advice and changed patch to instead check against
I40E_VSI_MAIN.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer