[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d13aaaqr.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:27:56 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ktkhai@...tuozzo.com,
security@...nel.org, secalert@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: Fix double free and memory corruption in get_net_ns_by_id()
(I can trivially verify that that idr_remove in cleanup_net happens
after the network namespace count has dropped to zero --EWB)
Function get_net_ns_by_id() does not check for net::count
after it has found a peer in netns_ids idr.
It may dereference a peer, after its count has already been
finaly decremented. This leads to double free and memory
corruption:
put_net(peer) rtnl_lock()
atomic_dec_and_test(&peer->count) [count=0] ...
__put_net(peer) get_net_ns_by_id(net, id)
spin_lock(&cleanup_list_lock)
list_add(&net->cleanup_list, &cleanup_list)
spin_unlock(&cleanup_list_lock)
queue_work() peer = idr_find(&net->netns_ids, id)
| get_net(peer) [count=1]
| ...
| (use after final put)
v ...
cleanup_net() ...
spin_lock(&cleanup_list_lock) ...
list_replace_init(&cleanup_list, ..) ...
spin_unlock(&cleanup_list_lock) ...
... ...
... put_net(peer)
... atomic_dec_and_test(&peer->count) [count=0]
... spin_lock(&cleanup_list_lock)
... list_add(&net->cleanup_list, &cleanup_list)
... spin_unlock(&cleanup_list_lock)
... queue_work()
... rtnl_unlock()
rtnl_lock() ...
for_each_net(tmp) { ...
id = __peernet2id(tmp, peer) ...
spin_lock_irq(&tmp->nsid_lock) ...
idr_remove(&tmp->netns_ids, id) ...
... ...
net_drop_ns() ...
net_free(peer) ...
} ...
|
v
cleanup_net()
...
(Second free of peer)
Also, put_net() on the right cpu may reorder with left's cpu
list_replace_init(&cleanup_list, ..), and then cleanup_list
will be corrupted.
Since cleanup_net() is executed in worker thread, while
put_net(peer) can happen everywhere, there should be
enough time for concurrent get_net_ns_by_id() to pick
the peer up, and the race does not seem to be unlikely.
The patch fixes the problem in standard way.
(Also, there is possible problem in peernet2id_alloc(), which requires
check for net::count under nsid_lock and maybe_get_net(peer), but
in current stable kernel it's used under rtnl_lock() and it has to be
safe. Openswitch begun to use peernet2id_alloc(), and possibly it should
be fixed too. While this is not in stable kernel yet, so I'll send
a separate message to netdev@ later).
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Fixes: 0c7aecd4bde4 "netns: add rtnl cmd to add and get peer netns ids"
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
net/core/net_namespace.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index b797832565d3..60a71be75aea 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ struct net *get_net_ns_by_id(struct net *net, int id)
spin_lock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
peer = idr_find(&net->netns_ids, id);
if (peer)
- get_net(peer);
+ peer = maybe_get_net(peer);
spin_unlock_bh(&net->nsid_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists