netdev - Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171219215414.GH6122@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 19 Dec 2017 19:54:14 -0200
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates
 2017-12-19

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:33:29PM -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> Hi Dave and Doug,
> 
> ==============
> This series includes updates for mlx5 E-Switch infrastructures,
> to be merged into net-next and rdma-next trees.
> 
> Mark's patches provide E-Switch refactoring that generalize the mlx5
> E-Switch vf representors interfaces and data structures. The serious is
> mainly focused on moving ethernet (netdev) specific representors logic out
> of E-Switch (eswitch.c) into mlx5e representor module (en_rep.c), which
> provides better separation and allows future support for other types of vf
> representors (e.g. RDMA).
> 
> Gal's patches at the end of this serious, provide a simple syntax fix and
> two other patches that handles vport ingress/egress ACL steering name
> spaces to be aligned with the Firmware/Hardware specs.

Patch 10 actually looks quite worrysome if a card would support only
one ingress or egress, but if all of them support both, then it should
be fine yes. Is that possible, to support only one direction?

  Marcelo