[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171220.144358.1892414104907740492.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:43:58 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, arkadis@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
ganeshgr@...lsio.com, saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com,
leonro@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
simon.horman@...ronome.com, pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com,
john.hurley@...ronome.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com,
linville@...driver.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
steven.lin1@...adcom.com, yuvalm@...lanox.com,
ogerlitz@...lanox.com, dsa@...ulusnetworks.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 02/10] devlink: Add support for resource
abstraction
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:58:13 +0100
> From: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
>
> Add support for hardware resource abstraction over devlink. Each resource
> is identified via id, furthermore it contains information regarding its
> size and its related sub resources. Each resource can also provide its
> current occupancy.
>
> In some cases the sizes of some resources can be changed, yet for those
> changes to take place a hot driver reload may be needed. The reload
> capability will be introduced in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
In what units are these sizes? If it depends upon the resource, it would
be great to have a way to introspect the units given a resource.
> + struct devlink_resource_ops *resource_ops;
Const?
> +static inline int
> +devlink_resource_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> + const char *resource_name,
> + bool top_hierarchy,
> + u64 resource_size,
> + u64 resource_id,
> + u64 parent_resource_id,
> + struct devlink_resource_ops *resource_ops)
Const for resource_ops?
> +int devlink_resource_register(struct devlink *devlink,
> + const char *resource_name,
> + bool top_hierarchy,
> + u64 resource_size,
> + u64 resource_id,
> + u64 parent_resource_id,
> + struct devlink_resource_ops *resource_ops)
Likewise.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists