[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171220.144540.251766956053019535.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:45:40 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: markb@...lanox.com
Cc: saeedm@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, leonro@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [for-next 01/11] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Refactor vport
representors initialization
From: Mark Bloch <markb@...lanox.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 21:21:51 +0200
>
>
> On 20/12/2017 19:57, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:33:30 -0800
>>
>>> +int esw_offloads_init_reps(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mlx5_core_dev *dev = esw->dev;
>>> + struct mlx5_esw_offload *offloads;
>>> + struct mlx5_eswitch_rep *rep;
>>> + int total_vfs = MLX5_TOTAL_VPORTS(dev);
>>> + u8 hw_id[ETH_ALEN];
>>> + int vport;
>>
>> Reverse christmas-tree please.
> we need dev for MLX5_TOTAL_VPORTS, so we can't have proper reverse christms-tree,
I know that there is this dependency.
> I'll just remove the initialization of total_vfs and do it after the declarations,
> and switch between total_vfs and hw_id.
Exactly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists