netdev - Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates 2017-12-19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171221.100334.1424255317941540281.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:03:34 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     saeedm@...lanox.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        leonro@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [pull request][for-next 00/11] Mellanox, mlx5 E-Switch updates
 2017-12-19

From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:19:09 +0000

> On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 12:56 -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:33:29 -0800
>> 
>> > This patchset is based on rc4 and I see that net-next is still on
>> > rc3, i hope
>> > this is not a problem.
>> 
>> If it doesn't pull cleanly into net-next, then it would be a problem.
> 
> It does pull cleanly.

But if it is based upon rc4 I'll get tons of crap that is non-networking
related and you should never create a situation like that.

That's not "cleanly"