lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171221110805.37931c4d@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:08:05 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     mhiramat@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz,
        vyasevich@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk,
        nhorman@...driver.com, dccp@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
        sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4.1 5/6] net: dccp: Add DCCP sendmsg trace
 event

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:57:36 -0500 (EST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> When you fix any part of a patch series, you must always repost the
> entire series from scratch, not just the patch(s) that change.

He probably gets that from me. I don't usually require a full series if
only a single patch changes. But I don't receive as many patch series
as you do, so I can handle that work flow without too much difficulty.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ