[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171222112439.12476-7-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 12:24:36 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] xfrm: check for xdo_dev_state_free
From: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
The current XFRM code assumes that we've implemented the
xdo_dev_state_free() callback, even if it is meaningless to the driver.
This patch adds a check for it before calling, as done in other APIs,
to prevent a NULL function pointer kernel crash.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 357764a2bb4e..079ea9455bcd 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1933,7 +1933,8 @@ static inline void xfrm_dev_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
struct net_device *dev = xso->dev;
if (dev && dev->xfrmdev_ops) {
- dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(x);
+ if (dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
+ dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(x);
xso->dev = NULL;
dev_put(dev);
}
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists