[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEfhGiztjNZcoeOC7SGCYqf8abUAsg9kgLTTYTQSPOWcGnSeWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:59:42 -0500
From: Craig Gallek <kraigatgoog@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: fix struct net reference leak
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Nicolas Dichtel
<nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> wrote:
> Le 21/12/2017 à 23:18, Craig Gallek a écrit :
>> From: Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>
>>
>> The below referenced commit extended the RTM_GETLINK interface to
>> allow querying by netns id. The netnsid property was previously
>> defined as a signed integer, but this patch assumes that the user
>> always passes a positive integer. syzkaller discovered this problem
>> by setting a negative netnsid and then calling the get-link path
>> in a tight loop. This surprisingly quickly overflows the reference
>> count on the associated struct net, potentially destroying it. When the
>> default namespace is used, the machine crashes in strange and interesting
>> ways.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this is not easy to reproduce with just the ip tool
>> as it enforces unsigned integer parsing despite the interface interpeting
>> the NETNSID attribute as signed.
>>
>> I'm not sure why this attribute is signed in the first place, but
>> the first commit that introduced it (6621dd29eb9b) is in v4.15-rc4,
>> so I assume it's too late to change.
> A valid (assigned) nsid is always >= 0.
>
>>
>> This patch removes the positive netns id assumption, but adds another
>> assumption that the netns id 0 is always the 'self' identifying id (for
>> which an additional struct net reference is not necessary).
> We cannot make this assumption, this is wrong. nsids may be automatically
> allocated by the kernel, and it starts by 0.
> The current netns can be identify by NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED, ie -1.
Thank you, I'll respin this with NETNSA_NSID_NOT_ASSIGNED as the sentinel value.
Craig
Powered by blists - more mailing lists